July 01, 2006
SAP has offered geospatial solutions in collaboration
with ESRI for a number of years. SAP management believes, however, that
the fundamentals of the market have changed. According to Oliver
Mainka, SAP's GIS program manager, the company has taken the last 18
months to reevaluate the solutions that it brings to its substantial
existing customer base. This self-analysis comes at a time when SAP's
main competitor, Oracle, has an established clientele, a mature
technology, and an appetite for purchasing companies in market segments
designed to displace SAP. In the fiercely competitive arena of
enterprise applications, such as customer relationship management (CRM)
and enterprise resource planning (ERP) and the systems integration
services that may accompany them, SAP and Oracle have nearly equal
market share with approximately 20% each (Source: AMR Research).
Market Discoveries
SAP's GIS program task force, code named "Sagres" for the Portuguese
town and site of the 15th century navigation school started by Prince
Henry the Navigator, conducted a careful review of its clients to
identify the GIS market potential. The Sagres team realized that not
many within SAP knew about GIS because its customers rarely asked about
it. However, through an internal review of customers responding to a
survey, the team discovered that 250 user organizations had reviewed or
completed a
SAP/GIS integration project. To explore further, SAP set about
observing customer workflows using a series of interviews in each
client's workplace environment. Results indicated that 95% of those who
were using geospatial technology were employing code created by the
customer using application programming interfaces (APIs) to integrate
GIS solutions, such as those from ESRI or Smallworld. The Sagres team
also found that customers feared losing track of data assets because of
a lack of integration with other enterprise systems.
The Sagres team also ascertained that the functionality most often used
by customers was fairly basic: map visualization, geocoding, proximity
search and simple location-based services such as routing. The team
learned that
80% of its customers wanted to integrate
GIS around an Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) application. SAP
collected the data and created use cases to determine
where the company could support these
applications and where functionality needed to be developed. It was
then up to the team to design an architectural framework and build a
prototype that it could take to management with the hope of bringing a
solution to market.
Prototype Architecture
With its strength in EAM, SAP understood that
it had a robust local government clientele. Its market research also
revealed that many local entities were using some form of Web portal to
display basic city services, but almost
none offered a way for citizens
to communicate with city officials about problems in their area. The
Sagres prototype, called Geospatial Enterprise Asset Management, or Geo
EAM, offers applications that a typical local government might want to
deploy, in both a customer facing and a professional or employee mode.
Citizens are treated to a Web-based interface for communicating power
outages or street repairs (figure 1 illustrates a simple city asset
finder), while city employees use an intranet for finding and updating
work orders (figure 2 illustrates a more detailed view of asset
information presented in figure 1). Functionally, SAP wants to
integrate enterprise applications already in use by its customers with
geospatial technology (figure 3). In the prototype, SAP NetWeaver
was used as the platform to integrate geospatial services and then
provide an application layer to expose the functionality to users
(figure 4).




Observations
Most
of the
applications proposed by SAP's Sagres team are those that you would
expect, following
a thorough market review of its customer base. These applications are
neither new,
nor unusual. It has taken SAP a while, however, to understand the
potential
within its customer base when its competition had already engaged the
market
with some forms of geoprocessing. However, SAP does not appear to have
lost
much ground in tapping into its substantial list of clients, even
though its
research found limited understanding and deployment of geospatial
applications.
As one of the largest independent software vendors (ISV) in the world,
SAP
stands to benefit substantially by simply educating its existing sales
force,
something that Oracle has yet to fully appreciate. So, with
SAP now making an aggressive charge
into the geospatial market and with Oracle well entrenched in many
applications,
it only leaves Microsoft to fully enjoin the fray among the top ISV's.
Geospatial technology is now an important competitive lever in the
battle for
enterprise system dominance, a fact that is not lost on the larger
systems
integrators.For example, Directions
Magazine recently reported
on the creation of a geospatial technology
division at CH2M HILL.
Booz Allen Hamilton has for the
last few years focused
on the homeland security market, and Accenture is addressing the
market for insurance applications. (Look for an article on that soon.)
These observations create a broader picture of a maturing geospatial
technology market. As
individual GIS software solution providers
change their business models from pure software sales to solution
integration
services, they begin to impact the ISV market previously dominated by
SAP,
Oracle, IBM and others. And with the recent entry by systems
integrators, the
clash among these three groups is just beginning and the result could
be a
frenzy of activity leading to mergers and acquisitions.
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Joe's article describes the major transformation in the geospatial market this decade. (1) For spatial data to reach a mass market it must move beyond GIS, a tool for professional land managers and engineers. As spatial data becomes a commodity enterprise vendors will take the focus away from GIS companies leaving the GIS community with just the responsibility to create and maintain the core data resource. (2) The enterprise user community doesn’t know or particularly care about GIS, but they are very interested in location and maps. (3) Enterprise vendors realize that association with a single GIS vendor will not meet their client's needs. They must support multiple data feeds. (4) The strategic question for the enterprise is whether spatial data is best embedded in the replicated primary data store (the Oracle approach) or found through loosely coupled web services (as per SAP). This is a debate that affects the entire SOA world. It will be interesting to see how long it takes Oracle to integrate Spatial into their Fusion program. Spatial has long languished with nominal support from Redwood Shores. Will Oracle be spurred on by SAP? If both Oracle and SAP recognize spatial data as an integral component of the BI realm the seas will indeed change. Mark Millman |
||||||
|
||||||
| The most telling point for me in the article was the assertion that most would-be users have basic spatial needs (basic map visualization, proximity search, etc.). That would indicate to me the emphasis should be on lightweight, user-friendly web-ified apps linked directly to the relevant enterprise data sources rather than some bulky, ponderous integration of "systems." We've all heard that 90% of MS Word users actually use about 15% of the program's features. I'd say that percentage may be lower for the mainstream GIS desktop software available now. But the difference in my mind is that I can blissfully ignore most of the Word stuff I don't use while the complexity of the average GIS app prevents the casual user from accomplishing even the most rudimentary tasks without a good deal of pain... Brian |
||||||
|
||||||
| This is another sad example of how traditional GIS vendors have moved too slowly and have not setup the right partnerships to work with the industry heavyweights. GIS is knocking on the door of mainstream and not one traditional GIS vendor has caught the ship... |
||||||
|
||||||
| Althought I'm catching this article a little late, I see this a the future of solution delivery in the corporate world that has large enterprise systems based on fundamental spatial data. The focus needs to be delivery of solutions and not the traditional "if you build an enterprise GIS, you can make faster, more-informed decisions." Lightweight, integrated and thin solutions that deliver GIS without users knowing how to spell it, will finally integrate our industry into the mainstream. Corporate Data Management and Business Intelligence will evolve into the Location Intelligence Management industry. |
||||||
|
||||||
| With most companies option for ERP solutions irrespective of the price factor, guess addressing the Location Management aspect of the client seems to be slowly taking precedence . Moreover now with more and more emphasis on meeting time bound targets and timely delivery of goods, GIS integration with existing ERP solution providers should be considered as the next generation of ERP or the best term would be to say "ERP is now evolving" |
||||||








