November 02, 2006
Ed. Note: This article first appeared in the
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s publication, Pathfinder, and
is reprinted here with permission.
Disaster-response teams of NGA and its predecessor organizations have
responded to nearly 50 hurricanes and tropical storms over the last 14
years. The team officially known as the Readiness, Response and
Recovery Branch has been bolstered by experience with the four
hurricanes that struck Florida in 2004 and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
last year. It continues to stand in the forefront of the
disaster-response community with the best available geospatial
intelligence (GEOINT) products and services to save lives and protect
property.
The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as
amended, enables the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to task
any federal agency during presidentially declared disasters. Further,
an NGA Memorandum of Understanding with FEMA names NGA as its executive
agent for GEOINT. Through this agreement, NGA is responsible for the
tasking, exploitation, product creation and dissemination of imagery
and geospatial products created from the analysis of National Technical
Means (NTM) imagery and data. NGA also provides technical expertise in
analyzing other imagery data sources, as requested by FEMA.
NGA has integrated classified and unclassified, government and
commercial satellite and airborne imagery in its analytical efforts.
Commercial imagery has been vital in creating products that can be used
in the field to give decision-makers a visual and spatial tool for
response and recovery efforts. NTM is valuable for damage assessments.
In many disasters, NGA personnel deploy to the disaster scene to
provide assistance on site. NGA also supports FEMA in planning incident
management and recovery operations.
Evolving Partnership
With improvements in technology, the timeliness, accuracy and relevance
of the GEOINT provided to disaster responders have improved. In 1992,
imagery analysts created film-based products, placing colored dots on
population centers to indicate the severity of the damage. These
products were hand-carried to FEMA, which created and distributed
finished products. By 1994, analysts were transmitting digital files
directly using software and workstations that FEMA provided.
Cartographers joined the original group of imagery analysts, digitizing
their hardcopy maps to assist in creating the files. Human
interpretation from classified sources allowed the intelligence to be
released at the unclassified level.
NGA and FEMA implemented a new damage classification system in 1997,
with standards for wind damage (hurricanes and tornadoes), earthquakes
and flooding. These classifications were paired with information such
as status of transportation systems and critical transportation
facilities. Analysts also began to depict access points for disaster
response and recovery.
With improvements in the technology of geographic information systems
and the capability to exploit data from analysts’ desktops, timelines
continued to drop. After the terrorists struck Sept. 11, 2001, the team
moved into the newly created North America and Homeland Security
Division. Geospatial analysts were added to the team and the group
struggled to find synergy between the tradecrafts. After trying
numerous methods, the team began using elevation points to register all
sources of imagery with vector information (feature data). After
assessing the damage, analysts linked their assessments to the graphic
information in easy-to-manipulate shape files. The process
provided very timely, accurate and streamlined imagery and geospatial
analysis when the individual shape files were merged into a single
large file.
What’s New
Analysts in the Readiness, Response and Recovery Branch are always
looking for innovative methods that increase accuracy and timeliness.
One new tool is Map Book, an extension of ESRI’s ArcGIS software, which
allows users to create a template and then pick a specific state or
county and “jump” to that location in their map document. This
technique has proven to be an efficient way of creating and updating
large quantities of maps very quickly.
HURREVAC (Hurricane Evacuation) is another tool that FEMA, NGA and
other members of the response community use to track storms as they
happen. This tool graphically displays up-to-date data from the
National Weather Service. Analysts can track wind speed and extent as
well as hurricane tracks (both past and predicted) days in advance of
the storm’s landfall to facilitate pre-storm analysis. Analysts can
also manipulate the data for additional planning such as changing wind
speed and direction. NGA has used these tools to create
strike-probability maps.
On May 22, 2006, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
announced a very active hurricane season for 2006. NOAA predicted 13 to
16 named storms, with eight to 10 becoming hurricanes, including four
to six that could become category 3 or higher. After a record-setting
season in 2005, NGA has been very active across the community to
prepare for the readiness, response and recovery mission.

|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| I was just wondering if in the aftermath of a natural disaster such as the present one, nigthlight data from DMSP-OLS could not have provided a rapid estimation of damages areas in which to focus first. Later on teams in the field could have complemented this rapid information of a first indication of damages. |
||||||
|
||||||
| This is nothing short of an outrage - the USGS has been run by such a bunch of buffoons and hacks for the past twenty years that we are no longer considered the primary domestic mapping agency. Everyone from Lowell Starr to Karen Siderelis and all of their boot-licking lackeys should be so embarrassed that they should all crawl into a cave and never come out. Due to their incompetence domestic mapping is heading to the Pentagon - NOT a good thing. "Oh, I'm sorry, that freeway exit isn't on the map because it leads to a military base and therefore is a national secret - it doesn't really even exist." |
||||||
|
||||||
| FEMA's been working with the DoD since, well, since before it was FEMA. Let's not forget FEMA started as the agency that was going to preserve our government when the Nike system failed and the bombs dropped: FEMA ran the Greenbrier and Mt. Weather and worked with DoE on long-term reconstruction and nuclear cleanup. And the DoD/National Guards are an essential part of any majro disaster response program. Now, does that excuse or change the devolution of USGS? Ummm, no. It doesn't. The mapping side of the GS has become the last refuge of 26-year fed veterans waiting for their 30-year payout...and the science side should be folded into USDA or other parts of Interior. That said, the NGA is hardly better than the GS. You might make the case their worse. NGA is certainly no more competent, has phenomenal systemic problems, and is constitutionally prevented from working domestically. That latter point...remember this -- USC 1385 "Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both" It might be argued that any NGA-er making a map of the States could go to jail. Nevertheless, it's never stood in their way when they saw a chance to eat the USGS' lunch. The GS is dead. Cut up the remains, give the science to USDA and EPA and give the mapping budget to the States to do it themselves. The advent of GIS has made national mapping irrelevant, and regardless there's better map data spread around the Country than any Fed program can every make. |
||||||









