Special Announcement
Poll
How has your usage of Google Maps changed since Google changed its data source from a well-known vendor to itself?
I use it the same way as before.
I use it about the same, but now I report errors.
I use it less. 
I use it more.
Google Maps has a new data provider?
Webinar SignUp
Click below to sign-up for our latest Webinar

January 01
2010 Directions Media Webinars coming soon!
Directions Magazine, Web-based Mapping, Business GIS, GeoSpatial Consulting, Location Based Services
White Paper Downloads
Get the latest white papers from our sponsors
Directions Magazine, Web-based Mapping, Business GIS, GeoSpatial Consulting, Location Based Services
Articles
New Product: NAVTEQ Parcel Boundaries
By Hal Reid , Senior Technical Editor, Directions Magazine
November 08, 2006

Classified Ads:
Take advantage of a special year-end sale on SPOTMaps, the 2.5 meter, seamless, color mosaic made to fit your area of interest. Save 25% off all SPOTMaps through November 10th, when you mention this ad! Click here for details

_NAVTEQ has introduced a parcel boundary data file (cleverly named NAVTEQ Parcel Boundaries) that could be the next big thing in the world of business geography data. The last big thing, in terms of mapping and geocoding, was the street centerline file … which has been around for a while.

Wide area coverage parcel data allow for much more accurate geocoding. They are also a good mechanism for disseminating public data, which in turn increase the usefulness of computer generated maps. Mapping at the parcel level offers more accurate maps which do a better job of portraying the geography. NAVTEQ’s literature offers a list of uses for parcel boundaries, shown below.

Uses for Parcel Boundaries. (Click for larger image)

Another example not listed above is public safety – parcel data better define the location of incidents and the surrounding areas. In this example, you can see the parcel concentrations and even estimate land use, residential, commercial and industrial, by the location and size of the parcels. The image of Teton, WY, shows an example of the database.

NAVTEQ Parcel Boundaries shown here in ESRI's soon-to-be-released ArcGIS Explorer. Note the two red-shaded parcels which have been selected for further identification. (Click for larger image)

Because the data are provided by NAVTEQ, a commercial vendor, the “which format” issue goes away; NAVTEQ provides the data in whatever format the user needs. As a result, the database has the advantage of greater interoperability among government entities as well as businesses.

The scope of creating this product is far from trivial, both in terms of coverage and assembly. To give you an appreciation of the range currently available, here is what I gleaned from NAVTEQ literature.

Coverage: The product was first released in October 2006 has approximately 55 million parcels – the most comprehensive packaged parcel database available today, according to NAVTEQ, representing over 50% of the U.S. population.

Standardization: NAVTEQ parcels are acquired from at least 4,100 tax mapping authorities, each with disparate format, projection, data model, and highly varied usage/distribution policies. NAVTEQ has built a standard format, structure and projection into which the company has standardized the data. Parcels are checked for accuracy, street alignment, projection, etc.

Product Growth: NAVTEQ has a team dedicated to enhancing the parcel boundaries product. The team is adding parcel coverage each month and is surveying the market to determine the priority for adding attributes.

I am wondering what attributes will be added, beyond ownership, area and the nature of what exists on a parcel. Will there be demographics? Is so, what about privacy issues? NAVTEQ has already addressed the “adding attributes” issue by using the common identifier, the Assessor’s Parcel Number (commonly known as APN), in the data model so that there can be links (joins) with other attribute sources. Certainly, ownership, value and structure size would be obvious data additions.

The data structure/content. (Click for larger image)

One of the interesting things about changing technologies is how quickly they are adopted and how quickly we forget they are “new.” Parcel boundaries will no doubt be absorbed quickly by the business community, especially as they can solve a number of challenges and improve overall quality.

Bookmark and Share

Your Comments
Post a comment
All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.

The ArcExplorer screen shot lists AND, TANA as data sources, but this is NAVTEQ data? (#1)
by John, streetmap
   
Date: November 8, 2006 03:13 AM
The ESRI screen shot references AND and TeleAtlas as data sources. That's funny, given the write-up says it's NAVTEQ parcel data...

ArcExplorer Screen Shot (#2)
by Hal Reid, Directions Media
   
Date: November 8, 2006 20:52 PM
The original image with the TANA watermark was a mistake from the beta version of ArcGIS Explorer. We have replaced the original image with the correct image. The ArcGIS Explorer database does include the TANA streets, but since they are turned off in the image, the watermark should not have been there.

Update Frequency (#3)
by Atanas Entchev, EntchevDotCom
   
Date: November 8, 2006 21:33 PM
Database update frequency is going to make or break this product, IMHO. Been struggling with the issue long enough to know.

NPDP Patent (#4)
by Dennis H. Klein, Boundary Solutions, Inc.
   
Date: November 9, 2006 01:40 AM
Take a look at the service...
www.boundarysolutions.com
Take a look at the US Patent 7,092,957...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,092,957.PN.&OS=PN/7,092,957&RS=PN/7,092,957
Then, let's talk.

Thanks,

Dennis


Availability? (#5)
by Barney Green, M-MNCPPC
   
Date: November 9, 2006 14:37 PM
Google returns all sorts of press releases about this data being available, but if you go to the Navteq website and do a search on 'parcel' it doesn't even return a press release about this dataset.

No patent infringement (#6)
by Marcia Little, Proxix
   
Date: November 10, 2006 15:37 PM
If you read the patent that Mr. Klein of Boundary Solutions posted, you will see that the patent deals with software and not data.

NAVTEQ Parcels (#7)
by Russ Kauffman, R. S. Kauffman, PLS
   
Date: November 27, 2006 00:58 AM
It will be interesting to see how this plays out in States where the creation and MAINTENANCE of Tax Maps, and I would expect derivitive parcel products are under the licensed practice of Land Surrveying. If the product is is just a image of the signed and sealed page with all of the required info that would be only a publishing issue , but when the offering is a deliniation of an "improved" parcel the outcome will be less obvious.

It will be interesting
Russ - NJ Professional Land Surveyor


Advertisers