November 01, 2007
Although the Santa Ana winds did not blow the fires as
far east as Redlands this time, ESRI still found itself on the front
lines in support of the effort to control the southern California fires
that swept through Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside and San Diego
counties last week. This was not the first time ESRI has supported fire
fighting in this region. The company already had resources in place, as
well as established personal relationships which had developed during
and after the fires of 2003.
Russ Johnson, the public safety industry manager for ESRI and a former
30-year member of the San Bernardino fire force, described the
assistance ESRI provided coordinating support for incident managers.
"The SoCal fires happened pretty quickly and multiplied much more
rapidly than in the past," said Johnson. "As a result, more resources
flowed into the areas so quickly that on the ground, (firefighters)
were directed to protect structures first. So for the first few days,
in terms of (firefighters) on the ground, no one was very effective in
giving people data. By the third day, when there was more command and
control structure built around the incidents, that’s when we were
effective in providing data, data storage and building maps that
provided the answers to strategic operations," he said.
Initially, fire fighters were postured defensively. They were most
intent on trying to protect assets in the path of the flames. Severe
wind turbulence caused by the fires created a flight safety hazard for
pilots and thus hindered their ability to disperse flame retardant
chemicals. For the first few days, the winds were very strong at the
coast but not at higher elevations. As high pressure developed over the
region, winds settled lower and lower, and both the mountain ranges and
coastal areas were exposed to extreme fire danger. Johnson explained
that this wind condition was both unique and unusually severe. Add in
drought conditions, an increase in housing developments, and an insect
infestation that created more dead timber and a "perfect storm" was
underway.
Fire Modeling Sent out of Kilter
Geospatial data helps to predict the spread of fires in many ways.
Vegetation extent, topography and the ability to indicate where the
wind will align with that topography are all key inputs. Models
developed with these criteria give decision makers the data necessary
to reduce losses. But the Santa Ana winds blew differently this time.
Predicting where the fires would spread next was complicated by
changing wind patterns and the unusually dry conditions.
At the incident level, where much of the action occurs very rapidly,
GIS specialists with the SoCal Operations Center were using GIS data to
tell the incident commanders where to build bulldozer lines and other
firebreaks. At the strategic level, where more long-range planning can
occur, they provided the parcel data that was overlaid with the
perimeter of the fire. This allowed incident managers to notify
citizens about the fire’s status, help route emergency vehicles to
hospitals, determine shelter locations and deploy necessary equipment.
In addition, from a western states perspective, the command and control
managers could more effectively select areas from which they could draw
outside fire fighting assets.
Geospatial
data are continuing to support the efforts to contain the fires and
help predict where they might be headed. The technology has become an
indispensable element in helping command and control managers to alert
the population and minimize property losses.

|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| It looks like pretty straight forward use of spatial data which can be acheived using any COTS GIS software. The issue - as always - is the ability to get hold of right data at the right time. |
||||||
|
||||||
| Hello All, I would like to comment to Siva at Ordnance Survey. First and foremost, and in theory, you are correct that any COTS software could be used. However, I speak with firsthand knowledge that most of the COTS vendors could give one hoot about the science of fire-fighting, nor has any other vendor worked so closely with the community in developing models, logistics, transportation, and other decision support tools for and with the community. In addition, most of ESRI's knowledge is first hand, as California has the best equipped people and apparatus for fighting catastrophic fires. Additionally, ESRI contributes these resources when and where they are needed. How many wildland acres are burned every year in the UK? If you can imagine the effort needed and colloboration among disparate groups required to support such events, then you might be able to grasp that technology does play a major role in saving lives. I for one am happy that a geospatial company can see the need and works for improving the infrastructure that will help improve disaster recovery efforts in Southern California. |
||||||
|
||||||
| This was good work. Nice puff piece for ESRI, too. Nevertheless, they deserve credit for the work they did. But if you're a citizen looking for answers, the best mapping information was done by a TV station, a newspaper, and citizens using Flickr and mySpace to share information. ESRI's work was in the bubble, and served the firefighters...good work, but in the bubble. Get the data onto Google and VirtualEarth in minutes and you're doing something. |
||||||
|
||||||
| ESRI deserves great credit for their ongoing support. I disagree with the comment that getting data to the public in minutes should be a measure of technical accomplishment. It can already be done, organizational policy and practice are more the issue, decidedly human factors. Displaying a red blob on a map sells well as a cursory media product but is not really useful if I want to know more. Moreover the media misunderstand and misinterpret such a map. There is a presumption that the fire is being fought only on the perimeter and the areas already red are burned over. Teams fight fires on the perimeter and in the heart of the red blob on the map. As a citizen with property at risk I found most online/media sourced map products crude, over 24hours out of date, frequently rife with errors and of little use (flickr and my space included amount to little more than disaster tourism). The most useful was the low tech transcribed scanner reports provided on a community website that provided ongoing glimpses of concurrent operations. By crossreferencing reports to a mapquest street map I kept tabs on fire suppression activities of interest to me. That being said, having someone plot all of those reports is not a solution, nor is it useful given the rapid changing environment. That the fire came close 2 hours ago has little bearing on safety now. |
||||||
|
||||||
| I think it's fair so say that there are different needs for fire mapping. Those with the responsibility of predicting where the fire is going so they can get people out of it's path just need the mapping to be quick and correct in terms of who and what may be in the path. Nice graphics is a secondary consideration, or can come later after the fire is out. I've known people who have taken mylar hardcopies of maps up into helicopters, held them up to the window and tried to register them to the landforms so they could draw the fire boundaries on them with a china marker. Need forces us to be creative. But that doesn't mean that the nice mapping is not needed. Having Google Earth maps show up on CNN draws people in, makes them feel more connected, and may even get them more involved. ESRI shouldn't be a target, just because other COTS software can do the same thing. |
||||||

