January 13, 2009
The Coalition of Geospatial Organizations (COGO) sent a letter to Congressional leaders last week requesting establishment of subcommittee oversight of geospatial in the House and Senate. Why make such a request and why now? Our editors look at the request, the timing and what the future may hold.
Show Notes
Reminder:
The 2009 ESRI Federal User Conference will be held from February 18th to the 20th at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C. Join fellow GIS users to discuss challenges and solutions unique to the federal government.
Registration is complimentary for federal employees, so don't miss your chance to discover more about the geographic approach to decision making.
Information/registration
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Congressional oversight and greater budget control will freeze geospatial investments across the Federal government for years while oversight tries to figure out what to do, and in the end will sharply reduce total spending since they will "eliminate overlaps" True, this may be an effort to "save" taxpayer money, but in reality it will result in crippled services. Federal budgets are segmented, competitive, antagonistic, and in the end duplicative only in the broadest sense...in practice they are tightly coupled to specific programs, end-user requirements, and legal mandates. Trying to standardize geospatial applications across the Federal community is, quite frankly, both impossible and impractical. I cannot understand why a commercial industrial advocacy group would desire such an outcome. |
||||||






