March 12, 2009
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) this week
announced (press
release) an update to Geospatial
One-Stop (GOS), the federal government portal for geographic data,
services and more. This is the first time the site has been in the news
for some time.
The update provides an opportunity for those in the geospatial
community to revisit the site, see what's new and see how the portal
can help in day-to-day work. The update reflects changes in data
querying, query results and how they are delivered, and further
information about the services the site indexes.
What's New in Querying?
Within the Help Center tab at Geodata.gov is a document titled "What's
New in Geospatial One-Stop (GOS) Version 2.3." It details changes
relevant to three different user groups: users, publishers and
administrators. I focus here on changes specifically aimed at users. I
used as an example a query noted on Twitter: the individual sought a
shapefile of U.S. Forest Service Regions. (Figure 1).

One of the new features appears in the second step of the query
process; it filters via icons the type of content of interest. The
options include Live Data and Maps, Downloadable Data, Services and
Applications, among others (Figure 2). The previous implementation of
this part of the search was a bit more hidden. Further, one of the
options, Geographic Activities, was renamed Planned Data Activities to
make it clear that such data were not yet available. It'd be nice to
see each type of content with a link (or mouse over) that provides an
expanded definition. A second new filter option provides the ability to
select metadata by collections. The current options include
Geodata.gov, Marketplace, GIS Inventory (Ramona) and options for
coastal data. While some of these collections are self-explanatory,
some such as GIS Inventory are not likely to be familiar to all
visitors and, like the types of content, would benefit from further
descriptive information. Other collections noted in the "What's New"
document, including The National Map, do not appear in the
collections
list.

What's New in Results?
Once I executed my query, more new features of GOS appeared. A review
of search criteria (Figure 3) showed what I searched, where I searched
(collections or in my case, no collections), the search's bounding box,
and the option to see my results in GeoRSS, KML, HTML or fragment
(defined in the "What's New" document as "a snippet of HTML"). I tried
to view the 93 results in each format. None were successfully created
on my Mac (Mac OSX, Safari), though all four appeared in my Windows
machine (Win XP, Firefox). According to the "What's New" document,
these tools use "the REST API" and allow "search results to be exposed
in external applications, such as RSS Readers, HTML pages and KML
readers such as Google Maps and Google Earth." Users have been able to
sign up for e-mail updates when new data appear that match a saved
query. These e-mail messages now include GeoRSS and KML links.

The results of my query were coded using the icons of the content type
filters (Figure 4). I think making the current content type
filter a bit more prominent would be helpful; the bold text of the
current filter was not as prominent as it might have been among the
colorful icons.

What's New in Service Availability?
I clicked on the best match I saw for my query, which was a link to the
Geography Network, but I found that resource unavailable. Had I been
looking for Live Data and Maps (the Geography Network is an
application), I'd have run into another new feature, a status check
(Figure 5). A Service Availability button on the resource's metadata
page taps into the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Service
Status Checker and returns a status update. In my case, the status for
a Web Map Service (WMS) from the Naval Research Lab was, in short,
"down" (Figure 6). Of the five Live Maps and Data results returned,
just one had its GetMap (one of the WMS services) "up." That WMS was
from the VT Center for Geographic Information.


The integration with the FGDC Service Status Checker is a true winner
from my perspective. There is nothing worse (and my students will back
me up here!) than finding just the right service and it being
unavailable. Further, this check of standards-based services like WMSs
confirms for new users that the server is at fault (though of course
there may be other factors in a failed connection). I'm hopeful that
since the Contact Owner button is right next to the Service
Availability button, users will not hesitate to make contact when a
service is down. I'd like to think hosts of such services monitor them
to see when they go down, but if not, here's another easy way to do so.
Two other updates are noted for end users, including enhancements to
the Statistics Tab and an update to the Maps Tab. New stats include:
- number of metadata records in GOS (211,114, as of March 5)
- number of records for each content type (geographic services, 20)
- number of publishers (with at least one record, 6,139)
- most accessed metadata records are identified (Mississippi and Ohio River Polygon)
The updated Maps tab provides access to maps by theme (basemaps, environment, geology) and scale (national, state, local). There's also an option to visit Map Stores like the USGS Store, The National Atlas and The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). I'm not sure "Map Stores" is the best term for these; I suggest these are "government map providers."
The other new features are aimed at data publishers and geodata website administrators. They include:
- tools to configure the GOS metadata harvesting interface and view harvesting history
- the ability to register multiple WMS service layers in a single service with ease
- an update to the federal government list in publisher profiles - federal publishers can attach an agency name to each metadata record (for example, Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Commerce)
The updates for end users, specifically those that access filters and information about service availability, are valuable additions. Just as enhancements to consumer mapping portals rarely drive huge amounts of new traffic to a site, a few changes are not likely to convince longtime non-users to head to Geodata.gov in droves. Still, each enhancement is a step in the right direction.
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Status check on availability links to active services returns null values for icons in the metadata field written by failed connections to content products published by government providers to harvesting solutions updated in profiles and filters delivering information outlines and enhancements. If you understood that statement, you're either the GOS administrator, a member of the FGDC, part of the inside-the-beltway community of clueless geospatial bureaucrats, or perhaps even more strangely...one of few people who could find anything worthwhile on "the ultimate cobweb" in the geospatial community. GOS is a disgrace. I am a concerned citizen. I believe tens of millions of our tax dollars have been siphoned off into a worthless dead-end on the web. I believe the USGS and its contractors are covering up that millions have been spent on a site that has hundreds of users - if that. I would like the USGS to publish the current user statistics for the site every month...or even show them live on the site. I would like an accounting of the user profiles - and how many 'users' are actually the spiders and bots from content aggregations sites, and how many are actual "people" trying to find geodata. The USGS and FGDC (ha!) should stop wasting money on GOS and look very, very hard at spending our tax dollars on something that's useful and relevant. Maybe just fund RAMONA, since it appears to be at least reasonably successful at gathering the info that GOS is purported to hold. |
||||||
|
||||||
| As USGS Project Manager for the Geospatial One-Stop project I would like to thank you for the thorough article and your suggestions for improvements. We will definitely consider these recommendations in future design. I welcome input from the community on what should be the next ‘Right Directions’ the project could take to provide better utility and value to the geospatial data user. We also welcome suggestions for the larger direction for the project, i.e. what activities could the project undertake that would really make a difference and help us build a better National Spatial Data Infrastructure? In this time of shrinking budgets for many Federal, State and local government entities I would strongly suggest the community take advantage of the Geospatial One-Stop Partnership Marketplace on the geodata.gov portal to collaborate and leverage their investments. The ability for users to save searches and be notified through email and GeoRSS feeds of new data and data plans has great potential to help discover and build new data partnerships. This potential for the Marketplace has not been fully realized to date. However, it is our hope that through the new capability of the portal to deliver content through feeds and other mechanism these partnership opportunities will be more accessible to the community. Geospatial One-Stop is very reliant on the content provided by its many valued publishers and we hope to provide more mechanism like the FGDC Status Checker for providing feedback to improve the quality of the collection. The more participation by the community (publishing metadata, registering map services, and posting plans or requests for data acquisition) the more comprehensive and useful our national collection will become. We encourage your readers to continue this discussion. Thanks, Rob |
||||||
|
||||||
| GOS clarifications for Anon Y. Mouse, Roquefort. Geospatial One-Stop currently receives approximately 21,000 unique visitors per month, compared to 60,000-90,000 total visits per month. Our design review committee will consider your request to add a visit count to our webpage in the future, and we appreciate your suggestion. Geospatial One-Stop works with the State GIS Inventory System (Ramona) in our combined efforts to better document data sets. The State GIS Inventory currently contributes approximately 7,600 records, or about 4% of the 200,000 records in the Geospatial One-Stop portal. These records have helped improve information on local data sets, in certain States, especially in areas where metadata has not been created. We Plan to continue working with the State GIS Inventory System to enhance the capabilities and utility of each system and improve the way information flows between them. While Ramona provides an inventory capability, Geospatial One-Stop portal addresses additional metadata issues, such as data discovery, interoperability, collaboration, preservation of knowledge, and others. We could not duplicate the error code you cited and would appreciate more information so we can properly address it. The FGDC map service checker tries to address some solutions for technical trouble shooting map services registered in metadata. If confusing text exists please let us know where and we will be glad to fix it. Since 2008, USGS has managed the GOS portal, and over time has invested significantly in helping to develop the standards and best practices to enable the building of a national catalog. However USGS has not invested ‘ten’s of millions of dollars’ into the system. In the early days of GOS, efforts were focused on long range data sharing efforts such as developing framework content standards for sharing data across the web. This effort involved working with FGDC to bring hundreds of individuals across all levels of government together to develop consensus based national standards and take them through the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) process. Developing the portal was only a portion of the GOS budget. Evolutions in GIS, the Web, FGDC and ISO standards, OGC specifications and the voluntary nature of contributing metadata, have all made for great opportunities and challenges in building our NSDI and the Geospatial One-Stop portal. While we definitely have not achieved all of our goals of discovery, interoperability, inventory and ease of use, progress continues to be made. Constructive ideas for next steps and solutions are welcomed. |
||||||

