April 16, 2009
A press
release from Qualcomm highlighting how desktop GIS and LBS
applications will take advantage of its new 3G/GPS chip, the Gobi, got
me thinking about the future of what we now call desktop GIS. That's
the typically large software install, with local data and lots of
analytical power. While it may tap into data or even services from the
Web, its core use is local data crunching and map design. In the
release Qualcomm noted how Microsoft with its Streets and Trips
navigation software and its MapPoint business mapping software would be
taking advantage of the location information coming from the chip.
DeLorme's Street Atlas USA, Topo USA and XMap were highlighted for the
same reason.
Qualcomm is doing the right thing by highlighting how the 3G/GPS chip
will be valuable in upcoming laptops and netbooks, as well as mobile
devices. Unfortunately, the market for desktop software as we now know
it, like the products noted above, is unlikely to grow substantially.
Instead, more of the tasks done on the desktop will move into the cloud
and be delivered by one or more services. The same functionality
provided by a Streets and Trips could be offered by MapQuest as a
service. There's no reason a MapPoint territory analysis could not be
delivered via an in-house Web service accessible through a browser.
And, how much longer will anyone, including engineers, surveyors and
utility technicians, be carrying around a state's worth, or more, of
topo sheets? The data and tools to mark them up will be downloaded in
small chunks, along with editing tools, before heading into the field
or when connectivity is available while out of the office.
The other big change these desktop products will have to face is the
pressure to put as many field apps onto handheld devices as possible,
be they enhanced GPS devices, PDAs or smartphones. iPhones may have
begun their lives as consumer tools, but why not put that power to use
for business? The launch of the Blackberry store puts that business
device squarely in a position to do business, including tasks related
to location. If anything, the desktop apps being touted to use the new
Gobi chip need to be rejigged as services for use on the desktop or
mobile devices. Hopefully, Microsoft and DeLorme are already well into
designing those offerings.
Another desktop product, though not in the geospatial arena, sealed its
fate in the past weeks. Microsoft decided to end
production of its Encarta encyclopedia product. At launch in 1993
the product was a multimedia encyclopedia on CD, then DVD. At the end
of its life, the product was available only as a download. What killed
Encarta? If I had to guess I'd point a finger at Wikipedia, not because
it's a better resource, but because it's a service, rather than a
product. It's constantly updated (for better or worse) and directly
linked to source all over the information world called the Internet. As
Microsoft noted in the FAQ about the decision: "People today seek and
consume information in considerably different ways than in years past."
And, I'd add, those ways are more about the network than the desktop.
The nature of the desktop is changing across IT, not just in
geospatial. There's no doubt that the number and type of devices that
know and can share their locations will only increase in the coming
months and years. However, that location information will rarely, if
ever, be staying on the machine as a parameter fed to local software.
(Qualcomm must know that, otherwise it would not have paired a GPS chip
with a 3G chip!) That location will be heading to a service on the Web
to turn the raw data into information. Qualcomm, in fact, highlights
that by citing a third company that will use its new chip. Absolute's
software will use the chip's location information for computer tracking
and theft recovery. One of its key features? To report the device's
location via the Web for
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Well, it'll work, and some people will no doubt appreciate the connections. As for the idea of "carrying around a State's worth, or more, of topo sheets" - that's actually a really, really good idea. The LESS of the ordinary, day-to-day map information you have to download through the wireless pipes, the BETTER. Location-specific map updates, database hits, and geo-processing calls - YES - the base map data, no. Storage is so absurdly accessible now there's no reason at all not to...particularly in compressed form. As for having to use a desktop tool to run some basic analysis, oh God, I hope not. The S/W giants will tell you that you must to preserve their license-renewal revenue streams, and to make sure you have "all the funtionality you need." You're right about off-platform calls to the basic services (buffers, radii, geocodes, etc.) replacing desktop processing. But it's good practice to carry phat maps with you in advance to reduce the download budget. Of course, the carrier's would like you to do otherwise. ;^) |
||||||
|
||||||
| Although we are seeing a move to online applications and map servers, there will always be a market for applications with everything stored locally whether it is on a mobile device or laptop. As Archie says, data downloads can take time. Perhaps more importantly in the long term, many areas have limited connectivity and always will. GPS will always be more available than an internet connection, as it is only limited at the Poles and in deep valleys/canyons. |
||||||
|
||||||
| Cultural canyons, too. Although with new uBlox and SiRF chips, the whole 'see the sky' thing isn't so important anymore. Inside a buidling too, if 100meters or so CEP is close enough...and for most folks, it sure is. |
||||||
|
||||||
| I understand the sentiment that “the market for desktop software as we now know it … is unlikely to grow substantially”. Certainly many of the advantages of cloud based computing are enticing. But I believe the desktop apps can experience a second wind and achieve growth, while the cloud based apps try to catch up to their capabilities . Perhaps someday “The same functionality provided by a Streets and Trips (will) be offered by MapQuest as a service.” …but how far off is that date? As a mobile sales rep with Streets and Trips, I can load 10,000 prospects into my map - that goes with me everywhere I go. If a prospect cancels, I can search for a new one that is within my specified drive time on the fly, get directions and find a lunch spot with free wi-fi on the way. Hard to do if I’m doing the searching outside of coverage…and I can do it without spending 50 bucks a month on a wireless broadband. Perhaps a good analogy is an Indian warrior expertly skilled in the use of the bow and arrow, pitted against the recruit armed with a musket. While the musket was clearly a superior technology, the ability to rapidly and accurately fire multiple arrows -while moving- in the same time that a musketeer could reload and get another shot off had devastating consequences for those more technically advanced. In time, advances in weapons technology obviously made the bow and arrow all but obsolete. So while I wait for the technology to catch up – I’ll be ‘hunting’ with my bow and arrow. |
||||||
|
||||||
| Desktop's utility depends on the trade-off between convenience and confidentaility. If people are seeking information in a different manner now,it is not out of any whim but because of convenience-the information is available , "updated for better or worse", on the cloud to tap it down. Naturally who needs to carry a static encyclopedia in laptop? It is amazing how simple common sense eludes people when they embark upon ambitious technology-based programs. Adena has simply hit the nail on its head. |
||||||
|
||||||
| From a personal experience , I think moving entirely to a web-based (cloud) computing mainly for geo-spatial services will take quite some time in those countries that lack the culture of data sharing and/or the needed computing infrastructure. As Srini indicated, desktop utility depends on the trade-off between convenience, confidentiality, and when it comes to the countries in those regions of the world it really counts; yet I see like others that the already starting and accelerating trend of consuming geo-spatial services on the web will eventually dominate... |
||||||
|
||||||
| The two PC applications mentioned in the article, Microsoft Streets & Trips and DeLorme Street Atlas, are far superior, when used for GPS navigation, in comparison to anything available on line. And even if there were an equally feature rich application on line, you would still have to depend on your ISP to provide good enough coverage in all the places you may happen to travel through. |
||||||

