January 16, 2005
There
are nearly 50,000 community and 200,000 public and
private water systems in operation today.Concerns have been raised
over
protecting the nation's water supply from terrorist attacks.While many
believe
that the threat of contamination of drinking water through terrorist
activities
is low (those that are out of touch with reality), a grim warning from
Health
and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson acknowledges the threat.In
his
resignation speech he stated that an attack on our food or water supply
would
be 'so easy to do.' However, it should be noted that there are no
specific,
credible threats to the nation's drinking water at this time.
In October 2001, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
began working with other government agencies and water suppliers to
ensure that
the nation's water supply continues to be protected from terrorist
attacks.The
EPA is providing local water utilities with the best scientific
information as
well as technical training, on conducting vulnerability assessments and
enhancing emergency response plans should an attack occur.To further
protect
the nation's drinking water supplies, the EPA has set up a special task
force
to enhance protection efforts already underway.
Protecting the water
supply from terrorist attacks is a very
large task.With all the attention and activity since 2001 why is the
water
supply still a likely area of attack? How real is the threat? How
difficult
would it be for terrorist to strike? These questions and more will be
addressed
in this article.
The
Water Supply
Let's look at the
characteristics that make the nation's
water supply a primary target.
In the U.S.the water supply systems are owned and operated
by many different entities.Some by State or local government and
others by private
companies.The water systems throughout the nation are highly
distributed by
design.A distributed design allows flexibility when the system suffers
equipment failures or routine maintenance.It is this type of design
that makes
safeguarding the water supply highly complex and extremely costly.The
nation's
water system is comprised of interlocking components that include: the
water
supply system (dams, reservoirs, natural lakes, wells, etc.); water
treatment and
filtration system; the water distribution system (pipes, pumps, valves
storage
tanks, etc.); and of course control systems often run by computers.
These
systems are mostly aging and in urgent need of upgrading, not simply to
protect
them from terrorist attack but to keep them handling the growing water
needs of
the nation.
Where could attacks
occur? Our nation's water systems are
set up to deal with contaminants.Many feel that a terrorist attack
which
places chemicals or even biological agents in the water supply is
unlikely to
be successful.Contamination of a reservoir with a biological agent
would not
likely produce a large risk to public health because of the dilution
effect.These
reservoirs contain hundreds of thousands and in some cases millions of
gallons
of water.A massive amount of contaminant would be required for a
successful
terrorist attack at this point.If agents were to be introduced at this
point
they are likely to be detected and unlikely to survive the chlorination
process.
Even so, filtration and disinfection of the water may occur down stream
mitigating the contamination.However, if the point contamination is
after a treatment
facility where filters, chlorination and other preventative measures
would no
longer be effective, the likelihood of success is much greater.
Fortunately,
this type of act is still subject to the dilution issue which would
lessen the
severity of such an attack.There are scenarios that have been
discussed where
the likelihood of success is high and for obvious reasons we will not
go into
any further details about those specific scenarios.
The
Threat

Did
you know - The first documented use of a biological or chemical agent
occurred
in the 6th century B.C.
Contamination
Contamination can be
caused by chemical, organic or
biological materials.There are laws governing the acceptable amounts
of
contaminants, measured in parts per million or parts per billion in the
nation's drinking water.We are examining the intentional contamination
of
drinking water as an act of terrorism.
Did
you know - Biological agents occur naturally and that the parasite
Cryptosporidium in Milwaukee's drinking water resulted in about 100
deaths and
made 400,000 other people ill in 1993.Cryptosporidium is a naturally
occurring
microbiological parasite commonly found in lakes and rivers that can
infect
humans and cause gastrointestinal illness.
The U.S.water
supply is one of the best in the world.Equipment
is in place to filter and chemically treat the water to make it
suitable for
human consumption.These facilities are required by law to monitor and
report
all levels of contamination on a regular basis.At this time water
treatment
facilities are not capable of testing for all known chemicals or
biological
contaminants.In fact, the detection technology to do so is costly and
does not
address the wide spectrum of possible biological and chemical agents.
Real-time
monitoring is critical to minimize the impact of a terrorist attack.At
present
there is currently no real-time detection capability for biological
pathogens
in water and only a limited capability for chemicals.
Disruption
Impeding the ability
of the water supply to reach the
populace can have far reaching implications.Businesses would not be
able to
conduct operations, process manufacturing would be halted, restaurants
would
close and our daily routines would be thrown into disarray.In many
areas drinking
water is also used to supply fire hydrants.Without adequate water
supply, the
fire department's ability to fight fires would be all but neutralized.
Attacks
on holding tanks, major distribution arteries, pumping stations or
filtration
and treatment facilities could cause significant disruption to the
water
supply.
Cyber-terrorism is
another potential threat to disrupt
service.Computer networks and digital monitoring technology play a key
role in
the management of our nation's water supplies.In theory, a skilled
hacker
could create all kinds of havoc either from within or from beyond our
borders.
Did
you know - Authorities previously have found a computer
belonging
to a person with indirect ties to Osama bin Laden that contained
architectural
and engineering software related to dams and other water-retaining
structures,
according to the FBI.
The highly
distributed nature of local water supplies places
pumping stations, holding tanks, electronically controlled valves and
miles
upon miles of piping in remote and often obscure locations making them
prime
targets for terrorists.The ability to continuously monitor this vast
distribution is not economically feasible.Even if it could be
accomplished
economically, the time to design, install, test, and train the
operational
staff of the security equipment could reach into the decades.
Assessment
Matrix
In looking at this
problem we used the TIE
(Transdisciplinary Intelligence Engineering) framework to rate the
water supply
threat, protection and impact.The output of this framework is
represented in
the following graphic.
So what security measures
have been taken? Rapid detection
and quantification of a chemical or biological attack on a water supply
is
difficult at best.Organizations responsible for water distribution
systems
have increased the physical security of each of facilities.However,
one in-ground
holding tank had a padlock on the door leading to the water contained
in the
tank.A simple pair of bolt cutters could have defeated that security.
For the
most part, water supply security has focused on access control and
intelligence, with minimal attention being given to enhanced sensors
that
detect chemicals or biological agents.Indications are that in the
coming years
this will change and more R&D dollars will be spent on monitoring
and
detection.Conclusion
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Please read the article at this link: http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/115676.php If you can explain to me ANY possible reason for three-port valves on mainline construction, please let me know what this would be. I believe the "terrorist attack" will come from "within." Jcphelan10@yahoo.com |
||||||








