March 07, 2005
In an article
published in Directions Magazine in 2000, Mike Phoenix of ESRI
noted how rapidly the GIScience workforce has expanded and how great
the need remains for high-quality education and training for GIScience
professionals.The situation remains the same today - the rapid growth
of the geographic information industry and its spread into new
commercial markets and government agencies means that demand remains
high for well-trained professionals.This demand has presented
challenges and opportunities for educators at almost all educational
levels.I will focus on the college and graduate levels here, but
important experiments are underway in integrating GIS into the primary
and secondary school curricula as a means of promoting spatial
thinking, improving geographical problem-solving skills, and
introducing techniques of environmental analysis and reasoning to a new
generation of students.Just as important have been efforts to serve
adult learners, especially professionals seeking to train or retrain
for new jobs without seeking formal university degrees.
The opportunities presented by this growing and changing demand have
also posed challenges for most programs in geographical, environmental,
and engineering sciences.The rise of GIScience in the past two decades
has been more rapid than the usual pace of change in higher education.
The heart of the challenge is that the GISciences require of students -
and teachers - new tools, skills, and methods that are changing
rapidly.GIS professionals are now expected to master software tools
and techniques that seem to change monthly.It's assumed they are up to
date with national and international geospatial standards; at ease
importing and exporting into all data formats, and expert in estimating
error, interpreting metadata, and visualizing data.Finding educators
who can keep up with these trends is difficult enough, but the cost of
implementing programs in GIScience is even higher.The price of labs
and support staff is also of concern to most institutions considering
moving into GIS education.Despite these challenges, educators are
responding in new and creative ways.
Creating model curricula to speed implementation
Prototype curriculum materials like the Core Curriculum in GIScience
produced by the National Center
for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA) in 1990 and revised
in an online version beginning in 1998 have been particularly
influential in defining and refining the core knowledge base of the
field.These materials have helped hundreds of instructors all over the
world develop courses in GIScience.Other efforts such as the GISAccess
Project and NCGIA's Core Curriculum in GIS for Technical Programs have
targeted one of the fastest growing educational sectors - community
colleges offering two-year degrees and certificates in GIS.These
curriculum efforts continue today with efforts by the University Consortium for GIS (UCGIS)
to create a new, model curriculum suited to today's changing workforce
demands.These and other projects like The Geographer's Craft Project
which I led in the early 1990s have had an unintended, but beneficial
effect of making available high-quality, web-based reference materials
for self-study by GIS professionals.I think it is safe to say that the
excellent materials now online have saved most professionals tremendous
time and energy finding answers to many technical questions.
Expanding opportunities in online training to serve broader audiences
While in-depth, integrated education in GIScience and related
disciplines is important for individuals entering the field, many
professionals are finding great value in online training focusing on
specific technical and software skills.Not long ago, professionals
seeking to upgrade or extend their skills had relatively few
alternatives from which to choose: relatively expensive short courses
offered by vendors and some universities and instructional materials in
print.Online courses and seminars have addressed this need with
tremendous success.ESRI in particular, but other vendors as well, have
seen enrollment in their online seminars and courses increase at a
tremendous rate in recent years.These online opportunities offer
several advantages over traditional in-class training - professionals
can take the classes when they need them, at a pace that fits their
schedules, and without traveling to a distant training site for a week
or two.Early experiments in online instruction were little more than
page after page of online text.These early efforts have matured into
far more inviting and innovative offerings.It is now possible to study
alone in a self-paced (sometimes called "asynchronous") mode, or take
advantage of online chat-rooms, help desks, and virtual seminars and
tutorials that promote synchronous interactions between teachers and
learners.
Establishing certificate programs to provide quality assurance
Certificate programs in GIScience have been increasing in number,
though not without controversy.Certificates are employed in a number
of professional and technical fields as a means of affirming the
proficiency and depth of training of students entering the workforce.
Although such certification is important in some areas of GIScience,
such as surveying, precise positioning, land-record and cadastral
mapping, and photogrammetry, there is no widespread agreement as to
what a certificate in GIScience should include.Students pursuing
associate, bachelors, or masters degrees in geography, planning, or
engineering with concentrations in GIS, will have excellent knowledge
and skills and gain little from being asked to certify their abilities.
And, with the field changing so rapidly, setting the terms of a
certificate program is as difficult as hitting a moving target.
Certainly I see value in setting standards for instruction in
GIScience, but the recent rush toward certificate programs is not
necessarily beneficial unless great care is placed on careful
curriculum planning and execution.
Moving into distance education to reach professionals
The final innovation I wish to highlight is the rapid growth of
distance education, both for degree and certificate programs.During
the Internet boom of the late 1990s there was speculation that such
distance education programs ‑ particularly those entirely online -
would rapidly supplant traditional classroom and laboratory
instruction.This has not happened except, as noted above, in respect
to online training focusing on specific technical and software skills.
Educational programs offering complete degrees and certificates are
still relatively few in number.Those that have succeeded mirror
conventional extension and adult education programs both in student
numbers and media.They appeal to a modest, but not large number of
students and typically use Web, print, and audio-video resources as
well as email, phone, and face-to-face contact.Still, these programs
offer many advantages to professionals with tight schedules to deepen
and broaden their knowledge and skills.The UniGIS program, an
international collaboration of universities offering an MS in GIScience
has been in operation for a decade.Penn State's and the University of
Denver's online certificates in GIS have also been very successful and
are two of many available nationally and internationally.
These developments give some idea why it is an exciting time to be
involved in both education and GIScience.I have always seen GIScience
as a field propelled by technological innovation, but it is no less
true that GIScience has posed challenges and offered opportunities for
education and training.GIScience has been at the forefront to
developing new programs and deploying new technologies to reach wider
and more diverse audiences and I can only hope that this trend will
continue well into the future.
Web Resources and Further Reading
Distance
Education Courses in Geographic Information Science compiled by Harlan
Onsrud
The
Geographer's Craft Project, University of Colorado at Boulder
Geospatial Workforce
Development Center, University of Southern Mississippi
GIS
Certificate and Masters Programs compiled by Karen Kemp
GIS Certification Institute
NCGIA, Core Curriculum in GIScience, www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc
and www.geog.ubc.ca/courses/klink/gis.notes/ncgia/toc.html
NCGIA, Core Curriculum for
Technical Programs
Pennsylvania
State University, World Campus, Certificate in GIS
UniGIS, MS program in GIS
ESRI Education and
Training with link to the Virtual Campus
University
of Denver, Geographic Information Systems Certificate Program
University
Consortium for GIS, The Strawman Report on the Development of Model
Curricula for Geographic Information Science and Technology
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| Is this distance learning as widely accepted as this article makes it seem? If you have a stack of resumes on your desk for a GIS position and one candidate has a MA in GIS from an 'off-line' (on campus) program, and another has the same degree from an 'on-line' program, will these applicants be given the same amount of credability and consideration for the position? Or will the online student be shunned? All I can think of is the current news regarding Hillary Duff's online studies at Harvard; which the people are putting her down for, saying that it's because she's not smart enough to go through the regular, rigorous program http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1497930/20050309/duff_hilary.jhtml?headlines=true... Also, When a potential graduate student is trying to make a decision on where to go to school, how do they decide whether or not to go through a residential program (where they'll get the full experience of college, i.e. meeting peers with the same interests, networking with faculty, atttending seminars and conferences, etc...) or attending the online school (where they have the flexibility to make their own schedule, they can still work and make money rather than becoming a poor, starving college student, and they don't have to move to a new location leaving behind loved ones, etc...)? There's a definate trade off between the two options, and this makes it a difficult decision. I personally am experiencing this first hand and would love to hear people in the industry's opinions. |
||||||







