Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Articles

All Articles | Post Comment

This Is Why Government Should Use Open Formats

Monday, March 18th 2013
Comments
By Tom Lee
Read More About: esri, ohio. openrecords, opendata
Classified Ads:

Summary:

The Sunlight Foundation chimed in on an Ohio Supreme Cout decision covered at All Points Blog last week. While the decision was about an open records law, Tom Lee believes the decision supports the use of open data formats.

James Fee brings news of a dismaying decision by an Ohio court. A real estate appraiser named Robert Gambill tried to use the state's public records law to obtain some data -- information about deeds and some aerial photography. Everyone seems to agree that this information is public, and that Gambill has a right to it. Unfortunately, it's not that easy. From Fee's blog post (quoting courtnewsohio.gov):

photo of a lock
In a 6-1 per curiam opinion, the court held that Opperman met the requirements of the Ohio Public Records Act by offering to provide Gambill with a copy of the county’s electronic database containing deed information and aerial photos of all property in the county if Gambill paid the estimated $2,000 cost of separating that data from proprietary mapmaking software protected by U.S. patent laws that is “inextricably intertwined” with the data on the engineer’s computer.

Gambill is welcome to come down to the government's offices to print out paper copies, or he can pay a couple thousand dollars to get a far more useful electronic copy that's been untangled from the proprietary software that houses it. Those aren't great choices.

The proprietary software in question is made by Esri. Their software is indisputably powerful and useful--you don't have to look far to find a GIS expert who'll attest to its worth. But situations like this one should make it obvious that government's use of closed, proprietary solutions come with real and often unexpected costs--both to people like Robert Gambill who have a right to the data, and for the rest of us, who could benefit indirectly from the ways that government's data is used.

This is why the use of open formats is one of the Open Data Principles that we spend so much time talking about. Government should buy the software it needs, but openness has to be a consideration when making those purchasing decisions. As Fee says, that one dissenting judge gives us reason for hope. But we clearly have a long way to go.

Thanks to Tom MacWright for the heads-up. Photo by Andrew Magill.

Reprinted from the Sunlight Foundation Blog under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.


Did you enjoy this topic? Check out these Channels:
Government, Open Source

Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

GIS Health News Weekly: SF Earthquake Impacts Sleep, Registries of Medically Vulnerable Citizens

Fitness Trackers Identify Sleep Disruption During SF Earthquake RE Sieber ‏@re_sieber  VGI & the quantified self: Fitness tracker UP shows spatial distribution of sleep disruptions near the earthquake The blog post from Jawbone, maker if a fitness device shows that more people closer the epicenter were awakened.   Registries of Medically Vulnerable Citizens   The idea of keeping a list of community members who need...

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Mapping Team: Hoping for a Picture-perfect Hurricane Season
Beyond GPS: Five Next-Generation Technologies for Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT)
Meet the Unknowns in the 20 Most Promising GIS Solution Providers of 2014
A Glossary of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Terms
Don’t Miss These Resources on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
Mapping Disaster: A Global Community Helps from Space
Alteryx 9.0: “Data Scientists Not Required!”
Millennium Space Seeks Your Space-enabled Big Ideas

DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2014 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved