Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Articles

All Articles | Post Comment

Will the train be stopping at Esri?

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, May 2nd 2012
Comments
Classified Ads:

Summary:

It’s a fair question as discussions continue about a new rail line from San Bernardino, CA into Redlands. The first phase of a planned line has three stops for the passenger rail service in Redlands: one near Esri, one near the 14-screen cinema, and one near the University of Redlands. The proposal is from the county transportation planning authority, the San Bernardino Associated Government (SanBAG).


View Rail to Redlands in a larger map

SanBAG held a meeting in April at Esri to collect input for an environmental analysis and a second meeting is tonight between 5-7 pm at the San Bernardino Hilton. Comparable service already runs between San Bernardino and Los Angeles and Orange County. There’s quite a lot of excitement about the service, the most common question being when the service will start. The current estimates slate purchasing in 2013, construction in 2017 and a first run in 2018 or 2019.

Regional, state and federal funds will cover the expected $130 million to $150 million in costs. The annual operating cost is estimated at $8 million. The train will run every 30 minutes to an hour.

While decreasing freeway traffic is one goal,  reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing mobility and improving safety are also objectives. Both Esri and the university jumped at the chance to have stops nearby, clearly looking to enhance lifestyles for new and existing employees and students. Planners are looking to build transit villages with residences, shopping and entertainment in close proximity.

San Bernardino Sun

Press Enterprise

 


Did you enjoy this topic? Check out these Channels:
Esri Technology, State and Local Government

Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

 And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

- via reader Jim and Poynter

30-Second Pitch: Valarm
What’s new with JavaScript and geospatial - wrapup from the js.geo event
Privacy 2013 Style: Exploring New LBS Devices and Services
Attention Shoppers! aisle411’s Indoor Location App is a Hit with Top Retailers
US Topo - A New National Map Series, 2012 Update
Recent Developments in Remote Sensing for Human Disaster Management and Mitigation - Spotlight on Africa: An Overview
Drones: War machine today, helpful tool tomorrow - NPR Marketplace
Everything You Need to Know about Landsat 8

DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved