Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Articles

All Articles | Post Comment

Would a Game Get You Involved in Planning Your City?

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, May 9th 2012
Comments
Classified Ads:

Summary:

On Monday of this week, Detroit Works, the agency planning the future of that city, rolled out both a game and a social network to get its citizens involved in the planning process. 

Which citizens? 

There’s a focus on the tech-savvy and sometimes less-involved 18- to 35-year-olds. 

What sort of game? 

The game, titled Detroit 24-7, involves “missions,” one for each of the three weeks it runs. They are titled: “Share Your Detroit,” “Living in Detroit,” and “Getting Around Detroit.” During the mission, players complete mission challenges to collect flags. Those flags are pinned on a map of the city to indicate what players feel should be priorities in different areas. The flags can represent arts and culture, entrepreneurship, public transportation, affordable housing, and environmental sustainability.

Where did the game come from?

The Knight Foundation provided funding and Boston-based Community PlanIt developed the game. The company ran a pilot in the Boston public schools for 500 youth and adults. In 31 days the group submitted 4600 comments. The game creators found that young people want to participate in such efforts, but do not want to stand up and speak at meetings. According to officials in Detroit, the city is the first to use such a game for long-term planning.

Are there prizes?

Top prizes include HD video cameras for top point earners (adult and youth) and for a randomly drawn top 50 point earner. Those with the most achievement badges will be entered in drawings for gift certificates from local businesses.

What happens when the game ends?

On June 6, Detroit Works will host a city-wide meeting for players and others to continue the conversation. Detroit Works will use the data collected in a report to Mayor Dave Bing.

Xconomy


Did you enjoy this topic? Check out these Channels:
Education, State and Local Government

Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

 And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

- via reader Jim and Poynter

30-Second Pitch: Valarm
What’s new with JavaScript and geospatial - wrapup from the js.geo event
Privacy 2013 Style: Exploring New LBS Devices and Services
Attention Shoppers! aisle411’s Indoor Location App is a Hit with Top Retailers
US Topo - A New National Map Series, 2012 Update
Recent Developments in Remote Sensing for Human Disaster Management and Mitigation - Spotlight on Africa: An Overview
Drones: War machine today, helpful tool tomorrow - NPR Marketplace
Everything You Need to Know about Landsat 8

DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved