By: Joe Francica
(Sep 03, 2004
I received the following letter this week
that I thought I would share with readers. Perhaps some of you have the
same question:
I would like to see an article about how Geographers and
others outside of the GIS field can successfully find employment in the
field with little training. Other than simply stating that course work
or certification needs to be required, which is obvious, what companies
and/or government organizations in the field are even willing to discuss
even entry level job opportunities with individuals that are not currently
in the field, but are geographically oriented, tech savvy, and have a base
understanding of what GIS is, how it benefits society, etc. What
skills is the field looking for in it's work force other than software
programmers and engineers?
Having been in this field for over 23 years, let me take this apart and
give my advice on each question:
Still, the bottom line is that it helps to know GIS technology because
more and more disciplines are using it...not just geographers.
|
Your Comments Post a comment All comments provided in this section are those of the individual who has created the post. These are not the opinions of Directions Media, its editors, staff or owners unless otherwise noted. Directions Media retains the right to edit or delete any comments posted herein.
|
|
||||||
| From my experience of 6-8 years within the GIS field in government and academia, the majority of those holding undergraduate degrees in Geography with little to no technical expertise in GIS usually obtain technical skills through voluntary work or self education. It is really up to College graduates to build their own technical skills in GPS/GIS/RS during their studies or during summer employment, which is not always easy. Further, I think people get confused about the purpose of a College (Diploma) versus University (Degree) education. Understanding the principles (data types, organization, methods of display and analysis) on which a GIS is built is what should be taught in University. The principles taught should transcend all platforms of GIS and should not change drastically unless new methods of analysis, display, storage et cetera are developed via science and scientific method. However, in College (those studying for a Diploma), individuals are taught the technical details of coding and structure of GIS with little understanding of limitations related to accuracy, both spatial and model. I have seen many instances where technicians of GIS have analysed spatial phenomena and come to false conclusions with little understanding of the accuracy of their input data nor understanding of the projection on which the analysis was applied. I have also seen errors in well known and widely used GIS software packages designed mainly by computer science graduates with minimal understanding of spatial sciences and the erroneous assumptions made when calculating distance and/or direction. The best advice I can give to this student is not to be fooled by the hype and misconception that the only expertise you need to get a job in GIS is programming and technical application experience. As well, 'high tech' does not necessarily equate to 'high knowledge'. Much of what we refer to as 'high tech' as seen in media is based on scientific discoveries made decades ago. I guess I am getting a little off topic here, but, the topic is definitely controversial. I see much of the technology sector jumping on the rollercoaster of GIS with little understanding of its originating use and or application in Canada by Tomlinson. To quote Sawada and Wilson (2001), "understanding basic geodesy is essential for maintaining the positional accuracy of our spatial data and the accuracy and reliability of any information derived via analysis and synthesis." Too many technicians of GIS fail to recognize the importance of a well developed knowledge of geodesy and focus much of their time on learning programming languages that die in months or in years (The marketing and selling of programming languages is now big business, just ask Mr. Gates). So much focus is put on learning how to code in new languages (which I myself have considerable experience in doing) that we are placing little focus on improving the way we visualise, analyse and assess error in model outputs, which are essentially the products of any GIS. I hope I provide some alternative insight into the issue. |
||||||
|
||||||
| From my experience of 6-8 years within the GIS field, those possessing undergraduate degrees in Geography with little to no GIS technical expertise normally obtain these skills through voluntary work or self education. It is up to University graduates to build their own technical skills in GPS/GIS/RS during study or summer employment. This is not always easy but is possible if you possess initiative (almost all GIS software vendors provide trialware from 3 months to 1 yr). Further, I think people get confused about the purpose of a College (Diploma) vs. a University (Degree) education. Understanding the principles on which GIS is built is primary in University. These principles should transcend all platforms of GIS. However, in College (Technicians) are taught the technical details of coding and structure of GIS with little understanding of limitations related to accuracy, both spatial and model. However, these conceptual lines are never easily drawn. I have seen instances where technicians of GIS have analysed spatial phenomena and generated false conclusions with little understanding of the accuracy of their input data (temporal, spatial, conceptual). I have also seen errors in well known and widely used GIS software packages designed by computer science graduates with minimal understanding of the spatial sciences. Much of these errors have to do with distance and direction assumptions. The best advice I can give to this student is not to be fooled by the hype and misconception that the only expertise you need to get a job in GIS is programming and technical application experience. As well, 'high tech' does not necessarily equate to 'high knowledge'. Much of what we refer to as 'high tech' as seen in media is based on scientific discoveries made decades ago. I see much of the technology sector jumping on the rollercoaster of GIS with little understanding of its originating use and/or application in Canada by Tomlinson. Much of the complication in GIS is inherent in the design for $ training $ and partially for control of the workforce, in my view. To quote Sawada and Wilson (2001), "understanding basic geodesy is essential for maintaining the positional accuracy of our spatial data and the accuracy and reliability of any information derived via analysis and synthesis." So much focus is put on learning how to code in new languages that we are placing little focus on improving the way we visualise, analyse and assess error in model outputs, which are essentially the products of any GIS. I hope I provide some alternative insight into this issue, or at a minimum, provide you with something to think about. Cheers Graham Reference Sawada, M. and Wilson, P.J. 2001. The geographers lament: Geoids, ellipsoids, map projections and coordinate systems. University of Ottawa, Ottawa. |
||||||
|
||||||
| Hi there, I'm not sure if I'm supposed to be writing into you for a semi-reply to this article, but here goes. How do I find employment in GIS when I have little training, even though I'm a geographer by training and have an understanding of the technology? - I was in this situation, and talked to government agencies. I explained to them that I did not have much hands on experience and would like to get on some projects doing data entry and digitizing. If you are computer literate, and have an understanding of what a GIS can do, you can pick up the rest along the way. What skills is the field looking for in it's work force other than software programmers and engineers? - Too many times geographers get lumped into GIS category. We seemed to have moved out of the cartography category, but not that far. Geography, is such a massively encompassing field that realistically you can do anything in it. You just have to get over the fact that you are not a trained GIS analyst. I constantly struggle with the fact that I've only had 1 course in GIS in university (as I'm sure many people who went to university have) and that I'm not qualified for any 1 position. The bain of geographers coming out of school is that they know a little about everything, but chances are, haven't specialised in anything. Consulting is a great place to start as they can teach you a wide variety of all the things you've missed out in not going to a tech school. And you can apply the more theoretical things that you've learnt in university. Other than simply stating that course work or certification needs to be required, what are companies and/or government organizations willing to discuss even for an entry level job opportunity with individuals that are not currently in the field? - Prove to them that you're willing to do anything to get into the circuit. We call it "sweat-shop GIS" - digitize, data entry. There are many skills that you can apply without knowing the software at all. In the meantime, while you're in the company, you can always do other things that the company does. Bottom line: If you want to do GIS, and TRULY do GIS, you'll have to take more schooling. There is so much to a GIS that cannot be explained by taking 1 course. HOWEVER, if you only want to utilize a GIS for some mapping and basic analysis, just jump on in there and do some bottom line stuff, you'll raise up quickly, because the fact of the matter is that if you understand the theory behind the technology, and you're that much further than the other people that just use GIS as a paint program. |
||||||
|
||||||
| I am doing a project for school and I would like to know a social science group that doesn't use GIS today. If you know of any please send me the name of that group as soon a you can. Thank you. |
||||||
|
||||||
| I have recently graduated with a 2.1 in BA Geography and after looking at a million websites that tell you what a great degree geography is there seems to be little that tell you how to actually get a relevant job. From my experience job sites dont seem to have geography related jobs and those that do are in GIS. I have a keen interest in sustainabilty, redevelopment and many human geography related topics what would you recommend doing about finding a job in these areas? |
||||||








