|
|
Census 2000 will include significant changes to the TIGER database and to the questionnaires that will be distributed to the public.
Several important changes are in the works for Census 2000.
The most controversial change, which is the introduction of statistical sampling designed to reduce
A Commentary on MicroSofts MapPoint 2000 Announcement
I suspect that someday we will reflect on November 3, 1998 as a turning point for the business geographics industry. For a long time prior to that day, we perceived ourselves in a niche industry wondering when we might draw the atte
The retail sector continues to evolve to the point where today, definitions such as Drug Store, Convenience Store, and Department Store are losing their meaning and the future of retail may be plain vanilla.
Things change, and change often occurs so gradually that you dont notice it unt
When Scott Elliott asked me to contribute to Directions, I jumped at the opportunity. As an industry consultant and observer, I had admired his former company, Wessex, for years. Wessex was not the gorilla in the marketplace, but was an important lynchpin—a lynchpin for the many might-be geogra
Metropolitan area growth over the next five years offers something for everyone. Atlanta attracts families black, white, Hispanic and other ethnicities. Some come for economic opportunity. Others seek the solace of the South in lieu of urban chaos in the North. Elsewhere, newly hatched deser
Bootus uppus, dontus crashus, all I want is simple Web Access. Make it quick, without a glitch, or ISPs I will switch.
I listened to the soft hush of the cooling fan, watched the small intense green, red and yellow lights, A bright 20-inch monitor that keeps changing, flickering, and drawi
Let’s be clear about the sampling issue.
The Census Bureau has been using sampling for years. Detailed socioeconomic data collected on the long form have always come from a representative sample of households. The plan for Census 2000 is a proposal to augment the traditional census with three s
Dear Reader:
For about 10 years, until this Fall, I played a minor role in the desktop mapping and demographics industry as the founder and President of a data publishing company called Wessex, based here in Chicago. On September 1, 1998, after that company was purchased by Geographic Data Techn
Directions Magazine is the creation of a long-distance, virtual synergy of an editorial team scattered between the Pacific Northwest and Upstate New York. We are collectively connected through the Internet and motivated by a mission to provide you with accurate, interesting and timely mapping and
The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.
In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:
With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.
In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:
So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.
She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.
The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:
And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.
I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.
- via reader Jim and Poynter