Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Columns

All Columns

Beware the “total solution”

Tuesday, June 18th 2002
Read More About:
Classified Ads:
Each week we are peppered with press releases on the latest “strategic partnership.” I love the phrase; it has such a “non-committal” swagger to it. Frankly, strategic partnerships never work unless there is money on the table, and at the time of these nuptials, there rarely is. It looks great on a paper, but unless there is somebody paying for a new software module to be created or unique workflow developed, the relationship fizzles and the solution or whatever, never makes it to market. The caution for the organizations who view these announcements with some wonderment is quite simply this: Beware the “Total Solution.” And usually that is what is being promoted. Company X gets with Company Y to bring you the “Total Solution for Land information Management,” The Total Solution for Site Selection,” The Total Solution for Linear Dynamic Segmentation Integration Sublimation.”

These relationships carry certain baggage. Why would Company X really want to promote Company Y’s products anyway? Company X has their solutions to sell regardless of the benefits of that, which is being “strategically partnered” with Company Y. But honestly, there is no such thing as a “total solution,” or the “end-to-end” workflow, or the “one-stop shop” for your everyday GIS needs.

Having said that, there are some relationships that are necessary and that produce bona fide results for the end user. The reason is simple: GIS software is only a tool and not an end in itself. It does not solve any particular industry workflow. Most GIS software facilitates data integration, basic thematic mapping, and spatial analysis functionality. It does not generally purport to solve applications in computer aided mass appraisal, routing and scheduling, or storm water management, for example. It does not generally come with the data you need or the database to support your long-term efforts. For these workflows, it is necessary and appropriate for “strategic partnerships” to exist. But the user must not only evaluate software, they must understand their organization’s requirements to get a job done. No one else can do it and you should not let a “strategic partnership” alter the hard work it takes to identify the job you need to perform on a daily basis.
 


Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

 And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

- via reader Jim and Poynter

30-Second Pitch: Valarm
What’s new with JavaScript and geospatial - wrapup from the js.geo event
Privacy 2013 Style: Exploring New LBS Devices and Services
Attention Shoppers! aisle411’s Indoor Location App is a Hit with Top Retailers
US Topo - A New National Map Series, 2012 Update
Recent Developments in Remote Sensing for Human Disaster Management and Mitigation - Spotlight on Africa: An Overview
Drones: War machine today, helpful tool tomorrow - NPR Marketplace
Everything You Need to Know about Landsat 8

DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved