Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Columns

All Columns

Lack of Vision Thwarts GIS in Politics

Tuesday, April 30th 2002
Read More About: local government
Classified Ads:

Politics, it is said, makes strange bedfellows. If only they had the right spatial data, such fateful peccadillos may not be necessary. Certainly, in today's technologically enlightened society, the breed of politicians we elect should be aware, use, deploy, and revel in the advances made possible by GIS, if not for the decisions that confront them each day, then at least for their own political expedience (read "election").

On Monday, we reported on an application developed by CapitolImpact.com, a startup company in Atlanta, that is promoting a web-based mapping applications for political organizations to "visually showcase" information regarding current legislation. The challenge they face is not so much that the solution is not needed, because it is, but rather that the politicos don't think they have a problem. They don't see that such a simple but elegant mapping tool could easily show them so much more than reams of text-based reports.

Why is this important? Richard Harden, principal of CapitolImpact.com and the former special assistant to the President for Information Management in the Carter administration, says that "if you are able to show political people how they can use the technology for their benefit, they are more likely to allocate more funds for its development." For example, you can use maps to help elected officials understand changes in the demographics of their districts." Therefore, the changing needs of the populace are served more effectively if the information can be presented clearly and an understanding of the spatial relationships discerned.

It is not so much that the functionality is unique, because it is not, but the CustomMapper application, with its well constructed "dashboard" interface, makes it easy to create and publish a map quickly. The available tools are not complicated, and, in fact, the primary advantage of CustomMapper is that it does not confuse the user with functionality unimportant to the essential purpose of data visualization. Wouldn't it be great if this tool could be available to politicians who are currently trying to decide the situation in CapitolImpact.com's own backyard with regard to the redistricting in Fulton County, Georgia? It's a vision thing.


Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

 And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

- via reader Jim and Poynter


DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved