Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Columns

All Columns

Looking for a Job in GIS? Maybe You Should Obtain a Security Clearance

Friday, January 28th 2005
Classified Ads:

In a story written by Victor Godinez of the Dallas Morning News and copyrighted by Knight Ridder News Service, Mr. Godinez suggests that in the Post 9/11 era “there's a ferocious demand for technology workers with federal security clearance.” A check of one of the geospatial industry's most recognizable employer's in the federal government, The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, confirms this fact. Jobs that are currently being advertised such as one for an “Imagery Intelligence Analyst" and another for "Supervisory Geospatial Intelligence," both jobs require "top secret" clearance.

The hitch of course is obtaining the clearance. The jobs at NGA indicate that it could take up to one year to receive the necessary clearance. And according to Mr. Godinez, "there's a one- to two-year backlog of applicants for security clearance, and only workers who are hired and sponsored by an employer that does classified work can get them." But, as with the jobs at the NGA, U.S. citizenship is required and some personal information may have to be surrendered via polygraph and drug testing.

So, be prepared to have your professional and personal matters scrutinized for one of these plum jobs. According to the Godinez article, " For the highest levels of clearance, there's no such thing as personal privacy," says Burt Heacock, a partner with staffing firm Paul-Tittle Search Group in McLean, Va. "You've got billions of dollars of new technology projects that have been approved and funded in the last couple of years," he said. "Most of that federal IT spending goes into the defense and homeland security areas, and a lot of those projects require security clearance."

So, how do you get it? Start by going to the website of the Office of Personnel Management to obtain all the necessary forms.

Good Luck!


Bookmark and Share


Stay Connected

Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






Recent Comments

Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

 And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

- via reader Jim and Poynter

30-Second Pitch: Valarm
What’s new with JavaScript and geospatial - wrapup from the js.geo event
Privacy 2013 Style: Exploring New LBS Devices and Services
Attention Shoppers! aisle411’s Indoor Location App is a Hit with Top Retailers
US Topo - A New National Map Series, 2012 Update
Recent Developments in Remote Sensing for Human Disaster Management and Mitigation - Spotlight on Africa: An Overview
Drones: War machine today, helpful tool tomorrow - NPR Marketplace
Everything You Need to Know about Landsat 8

DirectionsMag.com

About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
© 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved