Directions Magazine
Hello. Login | Register

Features

All Features

A Season of Change

Monday, November 2nd 1998
Read More About:
Classified Ads:
Change is in the air in the data business. Partners are becoming competitors, competitors are merging with each other, and new players are appearing in the increasingly intertwined fields of mapping software and demographic data products.

These changes will affect what software and data you buy, who you buy them from, and how you use them – and most probably the amount of money you spend! A brief glimpse at the past two months' activity in the mapping industry conjures up one word: Change

  • On September 1, Geographic Data Technology (GDT), bought BLR Data, and thus removed its only competitor for the sale of street databases in the high-end commercial market. They also acquired Wessex on the same date. GDT now has products which dominate both ends of the mapping market, from high-end products such as their Dynamap 2000 to low-end desktop data such as Wessex' Streets 4.0.

  • Just as the autumn leaves began to turn in early October, Detroit-based powerhouse The Polk Company entered the US cluster segmentation market for the first time in an agreement to create and supply the data in MapInfo’s TargetPro product.

  • At the same time, MapInfo published its two-page “Divorce” advertisement, urging customers of its (apparently!) former ally and data partner, Claritas Corporation, to "divorce" themselves from Claritas.

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), which dominates the business mapping markeplace along with MapInfo, is as we go to press choosing who it will name as data supplier for its Business Analyst product. That decision will be an important indicator of further movement in the industry.

    Streets Data Marketplace

    This is a lot of action in one marketplace. How did we get here, and what does it mean for you? The best way to answer that question is to recall similar changes that occurred in the demographic data vendor industry more than a decade ago.

    During the 1980s, Urban Data Systems (UDS) and CACI were leaders in the demographic data vendor market. And they had plenty of competition in vendors such as National Decision Systems (NDS), National Planning Data Corp. (NPDC), Claritas and Donnelley Marketing Information Services (DMIS). Geographic Data Technology (GDT) was alone in supplying street data.

    MapInfo was allied with Claritas, which supplied the mapping company's demographic data. And MapInfo software was embedded in those Claritas products, such as Compass, which included mapping functionality.

    Then, the mergers and acquisitions began, while new companies joined the fray:

  • Wessex began publishing US Street and demographic data in 1992. Its business model, selling lots of data to many customers, challenged the industry price structure.

  • Strategic Mapping (SMI) bought Donnelley Marketing Information Services in 1993. DMIS data and services (ring studies and other custom reports) were absorbed as part of the Atlas product line at SMI.

  • In 1994 BLR Data (BLR) began a major effort to develop a high-end street product (which came to be called StreetNetwork) to compete with GDT, at GDT's price point. The product, StreetNetwork, was first released in 1995.

  • In 1995, Claritas swallowed the data components of Strategic Mapping. (As a byproduct of this acquisition, ESRI acquired the rights to SMI's Atlas mapping package. ESRI continues to market and develop this product). SMI's "over the counter" reports capabilities had earlier been spun off to Information Decision Systems.

  • More changes occurred in 1997, when VNU USA, the US subsidiary of the Dutch data giant VNU, bought National Decision Systems, which had been renamed "Equifax/NDS" after it was taken over by the credit reporting firm Equifax. VNU is also Claritas' corporate parent.

  • Earlier in 1997, NDS had acquired Urban Decision Systems. And at the end of the year, BLR acquired Wessex

    What’s next?

    In purchasing BLR's product line, it seems clear that GDT was mainly acting to counter the price erosion that has been recently prevalent in this market. This is corroborated by the fact that BLR's products are being discontinued by GDT. GDT will likely be successful in this regard; for most of the projects for which its street products are being bought, the cost of the overall project dwarfs the expenditure on the street data.

    More interesting for the business mapping community will be the fate of Wessex. GDT has made several public pronouncements that the Wessex product line will be maintained, and will continue to be updated. There are good reasons to think this will be the case.

    First, the eight month marriage of BLR and Wessex proved that low-price and high-price street products could successfully coexist, and be sold with minimum cannibalization inside the same organization. TIGER-based products are fundamentally appropriate for a different set of end-users than are enhanced data sets. With an independent Wessex division, GDT will have an additional set of products to offer to new kinds of customers. This will be especially true for university and government customers, who have been a mainstay of Wessex but nearly absent from the roster of GDT clients.

    Demographic Data Marketplace

    This is how the marketplace looks to us now. Claritas, the VNU standard bearer, is clearly dominant here. It faces two sorts of challenges. On one side are two veteran, large companies and two newer, smaller, and perhaps nimbler ones.

  • In the past year, under the leadership of Eric Cohen, CACI has been more aggressive in its advertising and in exploring the use of the Web. And in August of this year CACI bought IDS, which specializes in web delivery of low-cost demographic reports.

  • British-based Experian is certainly large enough to challenge Claritas/VNU in terms of financial and technical resources. But they do not seem at present to be paying much attention to the US marketplace. Their recent acquisition of list giant Metromail may be part of the reason for this, and it is always possible that they will refocus the effort they launched in 1996 to penetrate the US demographics market.

  • Applied Geographic Solutions, led by Compusearch and UDS veteran Gary Menger, has made significant inroads for a company of its size. Easy Analytic Software is another company led by an industry veteran (Bob Katz); they are also new and relatively small.

    Claritas' other principal challenger may be the combination of The Polk Company and its Canadian subsidiary Compusearch. Compusearch, heretofore exclusively focused on products about the Canadian population, is well-suited for the challenge. They have an excellent team of demographers, headed by Dr. Tony Lea. And as a division of Polk they have the marketing resources to launch and sustain such an effort.

    The future of the MapInfo / Claritas relationship is also of interest. Will Claritas leverage the learning that its partner NDS has gained with ESRI tools (SDE and MapObjects) to remove the MapInfo technology in their products?

    ESRI, who together with MapInfo dominate the business mapping marketplace, is as we go to press deciding who it will name as the new data supplier for its Business Analyst product. That decision will be an important indicator of further movement in the inidustry. ESRI may well choose one of the smaller players, at least partly in an effort to increase the competition in this field.

    Is all this activity a good thing or a bad thing? We're interviewing the players right now, and will present their views, and ours, in the coming days. In the meantime, join the discussion and let us hear what you think!


  • Bookmark and Share


    Stay Connected

    Twitter RSS Facebook LinkedIn Delicious Apple Devices Android Blackberry






    Recent Comments

    Journal News Removes Interactive Gun Permit Map

    The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State  before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.

    In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:

    With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.

    In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:

    So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.

    She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.

    The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:

     And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.

    I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.

    - via reader Jim and Poynter

    30-Second Pitch: Valarm
    What’s new with JavaScript and geospatial - wrapup from the js.geo event
    Privacy 2013 Style: Exploring New LBS Devices and Services
    Attention Shoppers! aisle411’s Indoor Location App is a Hit with Top Retailers
    US Topo - A New National Map Series, 2012 Update
    Recent Developments in Remote Sensing for Human Disaster Management and Mitigation - Spotlight on Africa: An Overview
    Drones: War machine today, helpful tool tomorrow - NPR Marketplace
    Everything You Need to Know about Landsat 8

    DirectionsMag.com

    About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Web Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
    © 2013 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved