These changes will affect what software and data you buy, who you buy them from, and how you use them and most probably the amount of money you spend! A brief glimpse at the past two months' activity in the mapping industry conjures up one word: Change
This is a lot of action in one marketplace. How did we get here, and what does it mean for you? The best way to answer that question is to recall similar changes that occurred in the demographic data vendor industry more than a decade ago.
During the 1980s, Urban Data Systems (UDS) and CACI were leaders in the demographic data vendor market. And they had plenty of competition in vendors such as National Decision Systems (NDS), National Planning Data Corp. (NPDC), Claritas and Donnelley Marketing Information Services (DMIS). Geographic Data Technology (GDT) was alone in supplying street data.
MapInfo was allied with Claritas, which supplied the mapping company's demographic data. And MapInfo software was embedded in those Claritas products, such as Compass, which included mapping functionality.
Then, the mergers and acquisitions began, while new companies joined the fray:
Whats next?
In purchasing BLR's product line, it seems clear that GDT was mainly acting to counter the price erosion that has been recently prevalent in this market. This is corroborated by the fact that BLR's products are being discontinued by GDT. GDT will likely be successful in this regard; for most of the projects for which its street products are being bought, the cost of the overall project dwarfs the expenditure on the street data.
More interesting for the business mapping community will be the fate of Wessex. GDT has made several public pronouncements that the Wessex product line will be maintained, and will continue to be updated. There are good reasons to think this will be the case.
First, the eight month marriage of BLR and Wessex proved that low-price and high-price street products could successfully coexist, and be sold with minimum cannibalization inside the same organization. TIGER-based products are fundamentally appropriate for a different set of end-users than are enhanced data sets. With an independent Wessex division, GDT will have an additional set of products to offer to new kinds of customers. This will be especially true for university and government customers, who have been a mainstay of Wessex but nearly absent from the roster of GDT clients.
This is how the marketplace looks to us now. Claritas, the VNU standard bearer, is clearly dominant here. It faces two sorts of challenges. On one side are two veteran, large companies and two newer, smaller, and perhaps nimbler ones.
Claritas' other principal challenger may be the combination of The Polk Company and its Canadian subsidiary Compusearch. Compusearch, heretofore exclusively focused on products about the Canadian population, is well-suited for the challenge. They have an excellent team of demographers, headed by Dr. Tony Lea. And as a division of Polk they have the marketing resources to launch and sustain such an effort.
The future of the MapInfo / Claritas relationship is also of interest. Will Claritas leverage the learning that its partner NDS has gained with ESRI tools (SDE and MapObjects) to remove the MapInfo technology in their products?
ESRI, who together with MapInfo dominate the business mapping marketplace, is as we go to press deciding who it will name as the new data supplier for its Business Analyst product. That decision will be an important indicator of further movement in the inidustry. ESRI may well choose one of the smaller players, at least partly in an effort to increase the competition in this field.
Is all this activity a good thing or a bad thing? We're interviewing the players right now, and will present their views, and ours, in the coming days. In the meantime, join the discussion and let us hear what you think!
