On Thursday March 7 the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on a whether a county engineer correctly responded to a Public Records Act request related to geospatial Data. The engineer offered the data with a $2000 fee to the requestor. The Court ruled the action was valid because the data were “intertwined with a copyright-protected software program” and the fee was to separate them out. This decision prompted discussions about the nature of public records, of appropriate GIS software and data formats for government use and the role of consultants.
Location Intelligence and Oracle Spatial and Graph User Conference, Washington DC, May 21-22 Register today!
Use Esri GIS and Your Data Becomes Inextricably Intertwined - Spatially Adjusted
WIREdata and Its Implications for WI Geospatial Data
Public Records Request Denied? | gisn8
This Is Why Government Should Use Open Formats - Directions Magazine
Fact Checking: ?inextricably intertwined? software and data | News and Participatory Media
Ohio Sunshine Laws Handbook (pdf)
Ohio Court: Fee ok for Geodata Intertwined with Copyright-protected Software Under Open Records Law - Directions Magazine
Location sharing is back in the news as new apps try to offer better mousetraps for sharing one’s location with friends and family. We look at PlaceUs and Jink. Meanwhile two well-known players, LinkedIn and Google, add location sharing where it’s not been before. Do these new and enhanced entries suggest location-based services are maturing?