|
|
In this interview with John Palatiello, executive director of MAPPS, the Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors, the focus is on a bill introduced by U.S. Congressman Doug Lamborn, a Republican from Colorado representing the Fifth District that includes Colorado Springs. Lamborn is the Chairman on the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources (http://naturalresources.house.gov/Subcommittees/Subcommittee/?SubcommitteeID=5062).
HR 4233 was introduced on March 21st and some of the elements of that bill offer to:
• consolidate responsibilities for leadership in a National Geospatial Technology Administration within the U.S. Geological Survey; in order to
• merge duplicate federal geospatial programs into a new Administration; and one that
• encourage the uses of commercial data and private sector service providers; In addition its offers to establish a National Geospatial Policy Commission to provide a priority-setting mechanism that not only includes federal agencies, but Congress and non-federal stakeholders as well;
Editor in chief Joe Francica spoke to Mr. Palatiello about the bill, the background on it and what’s next.[MAPPS counts more than 150 member firms and tracks legislative and regulatory issues that affect the geospatial profession.]
The Lower Hudson Journal News has been under fire for publishing a map of gun permit holders in two counties in New York State before Christma. (APB coverage 1, 2, podcast). On Friday January 18 the paper removed the interactive map. Why? Publisher Janet Hasson gave answers in a media statement and in a letter to readers.
In a statement in response to The Poynter Institute (a journalism school) she argued:
With the passage this week of the NYSAFE gun law, which allows permit holders to request their names and addresses be removed from the public record, we decided to remove the gun permit data from lohud.com at 5 pm today. While the new law does not require us to remove the data, we believe that doing so complies with its spirit. For the past four weeks, there has been vigorous debate over our publication of the permit data, which has been viewed nearly 1.2 million times by readers. One of our core missions as a newspaper is to empower our readers with as much information as possible on the critical issues they face, and guns have certainly become a top issue since the massacre in nearby Newtown, Conn. Sharing as much public information as possible provides our readers with the ability to contribute to the discussion, in any way they wish, on how to make their communities safer. We remain committed to our mission of providing the critical public service of championing free speech and open records.
In a letter to readers published on Friday she wrote:
So intense was the opposition to our publication of the names and addresses that legislation passed earlier this week in Albany included a provision allowing permit holders to request confidentiality and imposing a 120-day moratorium on the release of permit holder data.
She goes on to say that during the 27 days the map was online any one interested would have seen it and that the data would eventually be out of date. She also noted that the paper does not endorse the way the state chose to limit availability of the data.
The original map/article still includes a graphic - but it's a snapshot, a raster image, with no interactivity. Says Hasson in the letter to readers:
And we will keep a snapshot of our map — with all its red dots — on our website to remind the community that guns are a fact of life we should never forget.
I continue to applaud the paper for requesting the data via a Freedom on Informat request, mapping it, keeping the map up despite threats and criticism and now responding to state law. I think the paper did a service to the state, to citizens and to journalism.
- via reader Jim and Poynter